The initial reference to HAARP appeared in reversed speech from George Bush, during the “emergency” Middle East press conference at the Crawford, Texas, ranch. Reversed speech surveillance of Bush was part of the Ken-Welch.com coverage of the U.S. plan to launch Armageddon on August 3rd, beginning with a false-flag nuclear incident in Israel that would prompt a nuclear attack on Iran and, most likely, the invasion of Syria as well.

As detailed in the report at Ken-Welch.com this operation was aborted by the presence of a Chinese nuclear armed missile, target unknown but presumed to be Tel-Aviv. This led to a mass scramble to redefine U.S. intentions regarding Lebanon, and the hastily called press conference. At this event speech reversals from Bush included the unexpected phrase “And then you HAARP it… see it… you nauseated them.”

Ken Welch, who wrote the report, noted that this was the first confirmation of HAARP being used as a weapon against civilian populations, and the fact that it comes from the White House itself establishes it as a “first” in many categories.

Now, confirmation comes from Lebanon itself. In an article posted at Rense.com on 8/23, Leuren Moret forwards the Lebanese reports on infrastructure damage ($2.5 billion!) and the large variety of weapons used by Israel on the civilian population. In the weapons summary, sudden bouts of unexplained violent nausea that were reported in southern Lebanon during the conflict are blamed on the possible use of a bioweapon, Bacillus globigii. However, proof of this agent is not actually offered.

Duration : 0:10:55

Technorati Tags: alex, bickford, bush, congress, destruction, douglas, earthquake, haarp, haiti, iran, iraq, joes, magnitude, mass, news, obam, of, Paul, Ron, truth, TV, us, weapon, world

Duration : 0:10:56

Technorati Tags: ABC, bickford, bush, CBS, clinton, cnn, de, douglas, earthquake, fox, fund, haarp, haiti, obama, port, prince, relief, truth, TV

Ken responded by giving an overview of what a truly integral politics might look like, and used that to compare and contrast with the Democratic and Republican conventions, both of which are less-than-integral. We think that this twenty-minute summary is brilliant, insightful, deadly serious, and wickedly funny, all at once. But by all accounts it is an extraordinary account of why all politics today are considerably less-than-integral, along with certain features that almost certainly would have to be included in the future in any truly integral Politics.

In this synopsis, Ken focuses on three items that all political theories have attempted to address but none have managed to fully integrate. These are the tension between (1) the individual and the collective; (2) the source of the cause of human suffering: is the individual primarily to blame or is the society primarily to blame?; and (3) the different levels of development that the different political parties tend to represent: any truly integral politics would include and represent all of them, and yet how on earth do you do that?

Due to time considerations, Ken did not discuss two other equally important ingredients in any integral politics. One. In representational democracies, people have a right to be at whatever stage of development they are at, and generally speaking, within free speech, a right to express the values of whatever stage they are at. Traditional-fundamentalist (blue) has a right to be traditional, modernist (orange) has a right to be modernist, postmodernist (green) has a right to be postmodernist, and so on. This is generally modified in practice, to the extent that the center of gravity of a culture will tend to impose its values on others, especially if they are first-tier (or less-than-integral) values. Nonetheless, in democratic societies, there’s a general background understanding that people have a right to be, and a right to express, whatever stage they are or whatever belief system they possess.

Two. They do not, however, have a right to act on those beliefs. This is generally handled in representative democracies by a separation of public and private, and by a similar if more specific principle of the separation of church and state. This means that, for example, in the privacy of my blue-meme mind, I am free to believe that Jesus Christ is my personal savior and that nobody achieves salvation without a belief in Jesus. In public behavior, however, I am not allowed to burn at the stake somebody who disagrees with me. In terms of integral psychology, this means in the interior of an individual (i.e., the upper left), the person can believe whatever they like; but in their public behavior (i.e., the upper right), they must behave according to laws drawn from a worldcentric or higher level of development (lower left), or else they are charged with civil or criminal behavior and removed from society if necessary (lower right).

This separation of church and state, or more generally what Max Weber called the differentiation of the values spheres, is one of the great and enduring contributions of the Western enlightenment, a contribution almost entirely misunderstood by extreme postmodernists, who in fact are operating under its protection while bitterly condemning it.

(The most common version of this is the aggressive attempt to reduce “I” and “It” to “We,’ or the attempt to reduce art and science to a social construction, which can therefore be deconstructed. As it turns out, this reductionism presumes precisely what it denies, but then, deconstructive postmodernism has been little without its performative contradictions.)

A truly integral politics exists nowhere on the planet at this time, principally because not enough individuals have emerged at the integral levels of consciousness, and hence no governments anywhere have integral representatives as members (except rarely and by accident). Its principal challenge is to create some form of governance that allows each stage to be itself within the constraints of not harming others (i.e., to let red be red, and blue be blue, and orange be orange, and green be green, etc—precisely because, as we saw, this is a right in virtually all free societies), and yet to govern from the highest, widest, deepest, and most encompassing levels of development emerged to date (starting at yellow). Most representative democracies do this anyway, except their center of gravity is not yet fully integral, and they do it implicitly, not explicitly.

Duration : 0:17:45

Technorati Tags: Bill, Buddha, bush, clinton, democrat, George, Integral, Karl, Ken, Naked, Politics, republican, Rove, W., Wilber

Duration : 0:4:59

Technorati Tags: 2000, 2000s, america, bush, decade, George, history, in, millennium, news, of, Politics, Review, States, United, USA

Duration : 0:6:3

Technorati Tags: bullock, bush, care, cbsepisode, clinton, haiti, health, palin, sandra, sarah, wipe

Duration : 0:7:4

Technorati Tags: bush, Chomsky, Noam, Politics, USA

http://www.InfoWars.com
http://www.PrisonPlanet.com

It is very important for us all to realise that we’re living under a simple but clever system that has been designed to contain revolution whilst projecting the illusion of being a free, fair and open democracy. The 2-party system provides firm support for the elite to implement their agenda from the top down, whilst the ordinary people at the grassroots level squabble between themselves over which political party is the best. In reality, it doesn’t matter which of the two parties you vote for because the same agenda will unfold regardless. Hence, both parties are controlled at the very top by the same force.

Oh yeah, YouTube, please stop censoring the view counters on these videos, it is beyond obvious now and just about every YouTube user knows that you fiddle the view counters to keep videos like this off the most-viewed lists. Why bother when it is just so blatantly obvious?

http://www.InfoWars.com
http://www.PrisonPlanet.com

_

Duration : 0:5:51

Technorati Tags: 2008, Analysis, bush, clinton, Commentary, Commercial, democrat, Documentary, election, illuminati, left, mccain, new, nwo, obama, order, Political, Politics, republican, right, symbolism, world

Duration : 0:1:56

Technorati Tags: biden, blooper, bush, generation, idiots, liquid, mccain, mistake, obama, palin, Politics, president, quotes, stupid